Private Insurance Is SOOOOO Much Better
The idiots shouting down people in an attempt to stop us from even talking about healthcare reform just love to talk about “rationing.” According to them, a Government bureaucrat will decide when Grandma has become too much of a burden and throw the kill switch on the old lady. Of course, anyone who bothers to look at life expectancies in countries with a single-payer system would immediately know that this is complete and utter bullshit, but when did one of these mouth breathers ever stop yelling the mantras fed to them just because those mantras were demonstrably false?
I have a new word for these idiots, but I doubt that any of them will be talking about it anytime soon. The word for the day is PURGING.
Are you familiar with it? No, we’re not talking about Callista Flockhart. We’re talking about that wonderful privatized care the knuckle-draggers are so desperate to protect.
Purging: It’s an ugly word, and it describes an ugly practice. But Wendell Potter, formerly the director of media relations for CIGNA (CI), says that’s exactly what health-insurance companies do when an employee at a small business is unexpectedly hit with a sudden, and expensive, illness: The insurance company “purges” the small company from their rolls.
In June testimony before U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science & Transportation, Potter said health-insurance companies “dump small businesses whose employees’ medical claims exceed what insurance underwriters expected. All it takes is one illness or accident among employees at a small business to prompt an insurance company to hike the next year’s premiums so high that the employer has to cut benefits, shop for another carrier, or stop offering coverage altogether—leaving workers uninsured. The practice is known in the industry as purging.”
Statements from Potter’s former boss, CIGNA President David Cordani, bear out Potter’s testimony. In a February conference call with analysts, Cordani said: “In 2008 we were essentially actively decreasing our posture in several markets, particularly the under-50 book of business. You could use the term ‘purge’ if you’d like. You could also use the term ‘hard harvests’ or ‘soft exits.’”
While the practice of intentionally making health insurance unaffordable for a small company may seem shocking, Len Nichols, a health policy analyst at the Washington nonpartisan think tank New America Foundation, isn’t surprised in the least. Of purging, he says, “It’s always gone on. It’s the way business is conducted.”
When asked to comment on Cordani’s statement, spokesperson Christopher Curran said that for small employers, “rates are often based on claims experience. While we try to work with all our customers, when medical costs are higher than premiums, we may need to requote.”
Senator John D. (“Jay”) Rockefeller IV (D-W. Va.) thinks there may be more to it than that. On Aug. 5, Rockefeller sent a letter to CIGNA Chairman and CEO E. Edward Hanway requesting an explanation of Cordani’s use of the word “purging” in the conference call, as well as the specific methods the company used to “decrease its posture” in the small business market and how much money it saved by doing so. Rockefeller has requested that CIGNA respond by Aug. 19.
Joy Mosley, the chief operating officer of Biotest Laboratories, a medical testing company in Minneapolis, is one business owner whose premiums were recently “requoted” by her insurer, Medica. Two years ago, in an effort to keep premiums down for her 77-person company, she turned to a high-deductible plan, coupled with a Health Savings Account (HSA), which saved her company about 20% on health-insurance costs. But then an employee was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. Medica, the firm’s health insurer, covered the million-dollar treatment, but the following year, it requested nearly $200,000 in additional premiums—an increase of 70%. “I felt angry that the health-care system left us unprotected,” says Mosley. Larry Bussey, a spokesperson for Medica, says, “We don’t purge. We try to keep our customers.” Still, Mosley is terrified about the prospect of opening next year’s renewal letter. “We can’t afford another exorbitant increase,” she says.
Now, I ask you: WHO is consigning people to an early grave? Every time an employer has to drop coverage, what happens to the formerly-covered?
The “health scare” morons trying to protect the 20% profit margins of the health insurers (many of these shouting dumbasses, in case you haven’t noticed it, are almost certainly on Medicare) should immediately surrender their coverage if it happens to be Medicare, and sign on with AETNA, United Health, or one of the other greedy murderers selling health “insurance” that is anything but. Oh, and do have fun trying to get them to pay a claim, should you have one, and enjoy your premium hike when it comes.
Tags: failure, healthcare, private insurance
August 10th, 2009 at 2:38 pm
Perfect description.
August 10th, 2009 at 6:44 pm
Excellent post, Jolly. Most excellent. Those “health scare” morons (love that description, btw) have been known to say they want to govmint to keep its hands off their medicare.
How the hell does one fight that brand of stupid? I’m trying to wrap my head around it, but I just can’t seem to figure out how to fight that brand of stupid.
August 10th, 2009 at 8:11 pm
Very good description Jolly!
August 11th, 2009 at 1:19 am
“Against stupidity, the gods themselves contend in vain.” — Schiller.
August 12th, 2009 at 12:09 am
Re: your excellent final paragraph, J.R. Those health scare morons will then learn who’s really rationing medical care. At which point the rest of us would probably be too decent to tell them, “Serves you right, suckers!” Although they would deserve to be told exactly that.