It is way past time for this. For months, Johnny has been trying to link Obama to a guy who committed his crimes when Obama was all of 8 years old. The way I see it, if you can go back 40 years in someone’s history to try to paint a picture that most everyone will agree is totally and completely false as regards William Ayres, then going back 20 or so years to examine ADULT relationships between an ADULT serving in the United States Senate and the chieftain of a tanked Savings and Loan should be fair game. I have been incensed that Obama seemed to be afraid to talk about the “Keating Five,” especially in light of our present financial crisis.

Caribou Barbie talked yesterday about Obama “palling around with terrorists” because he worked with a guy who committed his crimes when Barack Obama was all of 8 years old. I won’t even try to explain how utterly, patently stupid this is, because most people who read this ragwould understand that anyway. Instead, I will ask a question that I’ve never heard Sarahpoleon or any of the other wingtard scum try to answer.

What is more indicative of a man’s character: working on a community project with a long-reformed former terrorist, or doing regulatory favors as a sitting Senator for the head-man of a Savings and Loan that ultimately led to that S&L’s demise, and put American taxpayers on the hook for the losses?

It is my great pleasure to introduce Keating Economics, a site where you will soon be able to find answers for any questions you may have about the true nature of Johnny’s character. You’ll see that he isn’t just a corrupt, self-serving scumbag now-h’s ALWAYS been one. His “reformer” persona is an invention, created to take the heat off Johnny for his association with Charles Keating.

F__k that, Johnny. You took an issue that didn’t exist and won’t let go of it. Now, let us discuss an issue that very much DID exist, because it goes right to the heart of what kind of a man you really are.

I would like to remind some folks of something else the wingtards would rather forget. Back in the 1960s, one of the best known icons of the antiwar radical “Yippie” movement was a guy named Jerry Rubin. In the 1980s, Rubin resurfaced, and declared himself to now be a conservative. Not only did the wingtards not hold Rubin’s past against him, he was quite often held up by wingtard commentators as a great example of a guy who “saw the light.”

Rubin was allowed to redeem himself because he became a wingtard. Ayres, apparently because he did not become a wingtard, can never reddem himself. I realize that this is just another double-standard in a long list of wingtard double-standards, but it is something to consider when you’re trying to figure out all of this Ayres bullshit.

Tags: 2008 election, ayres, hypocrisy, keating five, lies, mccain

This entry was posted on Monday, October 6th, 2008 at 12:02 am and is filed under Election '08, Gopper Corruption. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.