Comments on: 9/11 Has NO ties to Iraq, Unless Chimpy Is a Seer http://reconstitution.us/rcnew/?p=6330 A member in good standing of the "Professional Left." Mon, 06 Sep 2010 16:29:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: S.W, Anderson http://reconstitution.us/rcnew/?p=6330&cpage=1#comment-13653 S.W, Anderson Wed, 25 Nov 2009 06:34:50 +0000 http://reconstitution.us/rcnew/?p=6330#comment-13653 I believe Bush had three strong motives for wanting to invade Iraq and get Saddam. First, I recently heard Bush being quoted from way back in the '90's, something to the effect that to be successful, a president needs a "nice, neat little war" to win. Second, Bush wanted to get even with Saddam for trying to hire a hitman to kill Bush 41. Third, Bush and Cheney wanted to secure contracts for American-based oil giants in the country with the largest untapped known reserves anywhere — at favorable terms, of course. If there was any real justice to be had, Bush would suffer legal consequences for failing to meet Congress' requirements for sending troops into Iraq. John Dean explains what Bush did and how it utterly failed to meet the requirement, and was therefore illegal, in his book, Broken Government. I believe Bush had three strong motives for wanting to invade Iraq and get Saddam. First, I recently heard Bush being quoted from way back in the ’90′s, something to the effect that to be successful, a president needs a “nice, neat little war” to win. Second, Bush wanted to get even with Saddam for trying to hire a hitman to kill Bush 41. Third, Bush and Cheney wanted to secure contracts for American-based oil giants in the country with the largest untapped known reserves anywhere — at favorable terms, of course.

If there was any real justice to be had, Bush would suffer legal consequences for failing to meet Congress’ requirements for sending troops into Iraq. John Dean explains what Bush did and how it utterly failed to meet the requirement, and was therefore illegal, in his book, Broken Government.

]]>